In today’s global supply chain, transparency and ethical sourcing have become more than mere industry buzzwords—they’re compliance necessities. For manufacturers and importers operating in France or the broader EU, the French conflict minerals regulation sets forth clear due diligence expectations. Therefore, understanding these requirements and knowing how they compare to similar global obligations is crucial for maintaining compliance and protecting brand reputation.
Conflict minerals are raw materials originating from areas of armed conflict and human rights abuse. The term typically refers to four minerals: tin, tungsten, tantalum, and gold, collectively known as 3TG.
These minerals are integral to various applications in the electronics sector, including smartphones, laptops, and other consumer electronics:
While these minerals are key to manufacturing, their sourcing has historically funded violence in parts of Central Africa and elsewhere. That’s why France and the European Union, following the U.S. lead, have created regulatory frameworks to break this link.
The movement towards regulating conflict minerals gained momentum with the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, which required companies to disclose their use of 3TG minerals sourced from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and neighboring countries. The EU built upon this foundation, expanding the scope to include all conflict-affected and high-risk areas (CAHRAs) globally.
France enforces conflict minerals regulation as part of the EU Regulation 2017/821, which came into force on January 1, 2021. This regulation applies directly to EU-based importers of 3TG minerals, especially when those materials are sourced from CAHRAs. These can include parts of Africa, South America, and Asia.
Unlike the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act, which applies to all publicly listed companies, the EU approach targets the upstream part of the supply chain. This means smelters, refiners, and importers are the primary obligated entities. However, French authorities encourage all economic actors, including electronics manufacturers and assemblers, to conduct due diligence.
Under French implementation, the Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM) and Ministère de la Transition Écologique offer guidance via the Mineralinfo.fr portal, which supports businesses with tools, country risk assessments, and due diligence templates.
The French conflict minerals regulation aligns with the Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 laying down supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. Accordingly, the key requirements of the French conflict minerals regulation are:
While the regulation primarily targets importers, downstream companies, including electronics manufacturers, are encouraged to adopt similar due diligence practices to ensure ethical sourcing throughout the supply chain.
Although the EU regulation doesn’t legally require all downstream actors to file a Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT), the CMRT remains the standardized tool widely adopted by global companies to meet customer and partner expectations.
Developed by the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), the CMRT helps businesses collect and report information on the use of conflict minerals. Consequently, it’s useful for:
In practice, if you’re a manufacturer in France sourcing components from upstream suppliers, your clients, especially those exporting to the U.S., will often require you to provide a completed CMRT.
As a result, while it’s not a legal requirement under French law for everyone, providing a CMRT is often a commercial obligation to remain part of trusted supply chains.
France has several key reasons for aligning closely with EU-level conflict minerals policies:
Notably, conflict minerals regulation is part of a broader trend in France toward sustainability, due diligence, and traceability. Moreover, it aligns with France’s long-standing commitment to human rights and responsible global development.
While both France (via the EU) and the United States aim to curb the trade in conflict minerals, they do so differently:
Feature | France (EU Regulation) | U.S. Dodd-Frank Act |
---|---|---|
Scope | Global (any CAHRA) | Limited to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) + neighbors |
Applies to | Importers of 3TG | SEC-registered companies |
Template Used | CMRT (widely adopted) | CMRT (required) |
Enforcement | National authorities | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) |
Focus | Upstream supply chain | Whole supply chain |
Subsequently, French conflict minerals regulation is more flexible in geographic scope but narrower in corporate application. However, due to globalization, many companies still align with both sets of rules, especially when selling across borders.
To help companies meet their obligations, the French government and EU bodies provide several tools:
Especially, these resources are helpful for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that lack dedicated compliance teams.
To align with the French conflict minerals regulation, companies should:
Report and Disclose: Maintain transparency by reporting findings to relevant authorities and stakeholders.
Navigating the complexities of the French conflict minerals regulation is essential for manufacturers and importers. By understanding the requirements, utilizing tools like the CMRT and guidance from Mineralinfo.fr, and fostering transparent supply chains, companies can not only ensure compliance but also contribute to global efforts in promoting ethical sourcing and human rights.
If you have questions or need guidance on how to comply with the French conflict minerals regulation, contact Enviropass!